Some People

Some people feel helpless & anxious.
Some people are bored.
Some people are self-quarantined alone and are lonely.
Some people are realizing that After will be very different from Before.

Source: Some People

What makes us believe a false claim?

Boris Johnson drops word ‘onanism’ from speech after criticism

Diana Birkett, a London psychotherapist, said Johnson appeared to have an obsession with masturbation. “His tendency to slip into sexualised abusive language suggests a disturbing lack of maturity in one standing for the highest office.”

Source: Boris Johnson drops word ‘onanism’ from speech after criticism

Johnson thinking about his Johnson…

British journalists have become part of Johnson’s fake news machine

It’s chilling. From the Mail, The Times to the BBC and ITN, everyone is peddling Downing Street’s lies and smears. They’re turning their readers into dupes.

Source: British journalists have become part of Johnson’s fake news machine


Catholic School Bans Harry Potter Books Because They Contain ‘Real Curses And Spells’

Can you feel the stupid?

Source: Catholic School Bans Harry Potter Books Because They Contain ‘Real Curses And Spells’

I was Boris Johnson’s boss: he is utterly unfit to be prime minister

If the Johnson family had stuck to showbusiness like the Osmonds, Marx Brothers or von Trapp family, the world would be a better place. Yet the Tories, in their terror, have elevated a cavorting charlatan to the steps of Downing Street, and they should expect to pay a full forfeit when voters get the message. If the price of Johnson proves to be Corbyn, blame will rest with the Conservative party, which is about to foist a tasteless joke upon the British people – who will not find it funny for long.

Max Hastings in The Guardian

Boris Johnson’s long list of broken promises to voters

Johnson has promised not to delay Brexit if he becomes prime minister. However, analysis of his record reveals a long list of previous broken pledges.
— Read on

Should I Respect Your Beliefs?

via Should I Respect Your Beliefs? | Courtney Heard

There is not a religion on earth I respect and there’s one simple reason: I value the truth. Centering your life and your core values around something for which there is no evidence is dangerous. Once you accept one idea on faith, you’ve set your standard of evidence extremely low. You can then be led to believe other ideas for which there exists no empirical, demonstrable evidence. As such, these beliefs make it easy to inspire murder, child abuse, science and medicine denial, wars, genocides, discrimination and the stripping of human rights. Stubborn belief in that which cannot be proven is the very last thing that deserves respect.

I reserve my respect for that which does deserve it. That which upholds the value of human life; that which values individual rights. I save my respect for people, for this planet, and all the creatures on it, including you, but I will not give it to your unfounded beliefs. The very fact that you feel the need to demand respect for your beliefs from strangers on the internet is perhaps a sign they are not worthy of respect at all.

Lord Heseltine unveiled as European Movement President

We know what purpose we have today.

Our purpose remains crystal clear.

We stand for a stable, peaceful Europe.

We stand for a union of Parliamentary democracies.

We stand for a continent of shared resources thus empowered to play a full and equal role in the modern world.

We stand for those who believe that there are obligations inspired by our relative prosperity.



Another Dead-end Brexit Exchange with my MP

My MP is Bob Stewart in Beckenham. He is a rabid Brexiter and “willovthepeepul” supporter. We have had several email exchanges since the 2016 referendum and they usually end in the same way: he either does not respond to my latest email, or as in this case, offers a patently ludicrous comment.

Dear Bob,

I have just watched this talk by the journalist, Carole Cadwalladr:

She presents further evidence that the results of the referendum have been impacted by illegal behaviour and by influences and money from outside the UK.

I ask you, how can you continue to support the country leaving the E.U. when it is increasingly clear that the majority was achieved by illegal means?



I received this response:

Dear Roger,

I am afraid that I distrust this journalist greatly and view most of what she says with great care.  As I understand it the courts have looked at both sides of the BREXIT campaign and determined that nothing illegal took place (my emphasis).  The Electoral Commission seems to have that view too.   I prefer a court/electoral commission version of events than that of a journalist whose judgement has proved so faulty very often in the past.

Sorry to disappoint you but perhaps you might look at some of the past reports written by this lady.

With best wishes,

Bob Stewart

Bob has made no attempt to refute the evidence, but offers ad hominem attacks and cries of “fake news”. So I responded with some links to various items of news:

Dear Bob,

I beg to differ that the Electoral Commission has found no evidence of illegal behaviour:

“UK court rules against electoral watchdog in Brexit spending row”

“Brexit: Vote Leave broke electoral law, says Electoral Commission“

Other reports underline the illegitimacy of the results:

“The referendum was advisory and, as such, did not fall within the scope of legislation that might, in other circumstances, void an election by virtue of lawbreaking.”

“The investigation also found Vote Leave was unable to provide evidence the people who received the messages had given their consent, a key requirement of UK electronic marketing law.”

“It is “very likely” that the UK voted for Brexit because of illegal overspending by the Vote Leave campaign, according to an Oxford professor’s evidence to the High Court.”

“Pro-Brexit campaign group Leave.EU and the Arron Banks firm Eldon Insurance have been fined £60,000 each for illegal marketing messages.”

The Vote Leave director admits that Brexit wouldn’t have won without the £350 million for the NHS lies.

Your response does not disappoint. I expected no more. Instead of offering evidence to refute the claims made in the Cadwalladr video and elsewhere, you simply offer the Trumpian fake news defence.

The referendum was called not because it was in the national interest, but because David Cameron was attempting to appease the eurosceptics in the Tory Party and the loss of votes to UKIP. Theresa May became PM because she was apparently considered the least-worst option by 199 Conservative MPs. She has continued to favour protecting her party over the national interest.

I would be fascinated to read any arguments you may wish to offer to dissuade me of that view.



And Bob’s final sally:


I don’t want to get into a ping pong match but will simply say my belief.  If illegal stuff had actually been done do you not think someone like Gina  Miller for instance would have taken an organisation or persons to court for it?  That has not happened as far as I can see!


No “illegal stuff? Do fine by the Electoral Commission and ICO fines not count? Again no evidence-based arguments and no attempt to deny that the referendum and May’s currently behaviour is all about looking after the Tory Party and not about the best interests of the contry.

Bob Stewart appears on the Tory whips alleged sleaze list. Whether that has influenced his voting behaviour, I cannot say.