Why 18 Holes and 14 Clubs?

Why does a standard round of golf consist of 18 holes, and why can players carry no more than 14 clubs? The answers reveal two different influences on golf’s development: the gradual adoption of a convention established at St Andrews in 1764, and a deliberate attempt to regulate equipment in the 1930s.

How 18 Holes Became the Standard

Early golf courses had no standard number of holes. At various times, Leith Links had five, Musselburgh seven and Prestwick twelve. Their layouts reflected the land available and local playing traditions.

At St Andrews, the Old Course originally had 12 physical holes. Ten were played twice, once going out and again returning, giving a round of 22 holes.

On 4 October 1764, the golfers of St Andrews resolved to combine the first four short holes into two. As these holes were played on both the outward and return legs, the change reduced the round from 22 holes to 18.

The decision was intended to improve the course, not to establish a universal standard. The resulting 18-hole round still used only ten physical holes, eight of which were played twice.

From an 18-Hole Round to an 18-Hole Course

As golf became more popular, players going outwards and returning towards the clubhouse increasingly shared greens, sometimes playing towards the same hole. Separate holes on the shared greens helped resolve the problem.

The practice developed gradually. A plan from 1836 shows two holes on one green, and further changes followed in 1855. In 1856–57, Allan Robertson undertook substantial work on the greens, probably enlarging them to accommodate two holes in simultaneous use.

By May 1857, St Andrews offered 18 distinct holes of play, although several continued to share large putting surfaces. White flags identified outward holes and red flags the returning holes. The Fifeshire Journal welcomed the arrangement, reporting that it reduced confusion and delays.

According to Scottish Golf History, the Royal and Ancient Golf Club’s 1842 rules already recognised an 18-hole round, with similar wording appearing in 1858. Other clubs, however, continued to follow their own conventions.

How Other Courses Adopted 18 Holes

The spread of the 18-hole course took decades rather than years.

Research published by Scottish Golf History identifies several important milestones:

Year Course Development
1857 St Andrews Established 18 distinct holes of play.
1868 Leven and Lundin Established an 18-hole course with separate fairways and greens.
1869 Royston Earliest documented 18-hole course outside Scotland, according to Scottish Golf History.
1871 Hoylake, Wimbledon Common and Forfar All adopted 18 holes.
1882–83 Prestwick Expanded from 12 to 18 holes.
1891–92 Muirfield Opened with 16 holes in 1891, extending to 18 for the 1892 Open.

The Leven and Lundin layout was particularly significant because it had 18 separate fairways and greens, making it recognisably similar to a modern course.

Why Did Other Clubs Follow?

The influence of St Andrews extended well beyond its own links. Scottish Golf History suggests that an important factor was the overlapping membership of prominent golfers who belonged both to the Royal and Ancient Golf Club and to other clubs. These golfers favoured consistent rules and playing arrangements, helping to spread the preference for 18 holes.

The Open Championship provides an illustration of how gradually that preference took hold. The first Open was held at Prestwick in 1860, when competitors played three circuits of its 12-hole course. From 1872, the championship rotated between Prestwick, St Andrews and Musselburgh. Each hosted a 36-hole competition, but the number of circuits differed:

  • Prestwick: three circuits of 12 holes.
  • St Andrews: two circuits of 18 holes.
  • Musselburgh: four circuits of nine holes.

Prestwick had already begun staging 18-hole medal competitions by playing some holes twice. Its subsequent expansion to 18 separate holes in 1882–83 brought it into line with the Old Course, and the enlarged course hosted its first Open in 1884. The Honourable Company of Edinburgh Golfers also moved towards the 18-hole format when it relocated from Musselburgh to Muirfield. The new layout opened with 16 holes in 1891 but was extended to 18 for the following year’s Open Championship.

By the 1890s, 18 holes had become the preferred arrangement among the game’s leading clubs, although nine-hole courses remained common. According to Scottish Golf History, approximately half of Britain’s golf courses still had nine holes in 1919. The same source notes that an 18-hole stipulated round was not formally specified in the Rules of Golf until 1950.

What About the Whisky Story?

A popular golfing legend claims that a bottle of Scotch whisky contains 18 shots, explaining why a round consists of 18 holes. It is an entertaining anecdote, but there is no credible historical evidence to support it.

Why Are Golfers Limited to 14 Clubs?

Unlike the 18-hole convention, the 14-club limit was introduced deliberately. Until the 1930s, golfers could carry as many clubs as they wished. Improvements in club design, particularly the adoption of steel shafts during the 1920s, contributed to the development of increasingly specialised sets.

Steel shafts offered greater consistency but changed the feel and playing characteristics of clubs. Some accomplished players believed they had less freedom to shape shots than with traditional hickory shafts. Carrying additional clubs for particular distances and trajectories offered one solution. The American amateur champion Lawson Little was known to carry as many as 25 clubs. According to the United States Golf Association (USGA), some golfers carried 30 or more.

Why Introduce a Limit?

The governing bodies became concerned about the increasing number of specialised clubs. Their principal objective was to preserve shotmaking: the ability to produce different distances, trajectories and shapes by adjusting how a club was played, rather than selecting a specialised club for every situation. Other considerations included reducing the physical burden on caddies, avoiding delays caused by excessive club selection, and limiting the advantage enjoyed by golfers who could afford particularly extensive collections.

The USGA announced its decision in late 1936, with the 14-club limit taking effect on 1 January 1938. The Royal and Ancient Golf Club initially took a different position but subsequently adopted the same restriction, effective in May 1939.

Why Exactly 14?

The precise choice of 14 is less clearly documented. One explanation sometimes offered is that a conventional set consisted of four woods, nine irons and a putter. That produces 14 clubs, but there is insufficient historical evidence to establish it as the reason the governing bodies selected that number.

We know why they wanted a limit. We cannot say with equal confidence why they settled on precisely 14. The restriction survives in today’s Rules of Golf. Rule 4.1b permits players to carry fewer than 14 clubs and, subject to certain conditions, add clubs during a round until they reach the maximum.

Tradition and Regulation

The two conventions illustrate different influences on golf’s development. The 18-hole round emerged from a practical alteration to St Andrews and became standard through tradition and the influence of leading clubs. The 14-club limit was a deliberate regulatory decision intended to preserve the importance of golfing skill while addressing practical concerns about equipment.

Nearly nine decades later, the principle remains relevant: improvements in equipment should not diminish the importance of a golfer’s ability to play different shots.


A Note on This Article

This article was prompted by a YouTube video in which Rick Shiels was talking to Tommy Fleetwood. During their conversation, the whisky story was presented as fact, while the reason for the 14-club limit remained unexplained. Curious about both claims, I decided to investigate.

The article was researched and written with the assistance of ChatGPT, with an independent review by Claude. Both AI tools helped examine the historical evidence and refine the text.

Sources and Further Reading

Testing the WordPress plugin for ChatGPT

This is a test post created through the WordPress.com plugin for ChatGPT. The aim is to try a workflow in which I develop a post in conversation, then have it sent directly to Oddrops.

The process starts with connecting WordPress.com to ChatGPT and granting the relevant permissions. ChatGPT can then identify the sites available through that connection. In this case, it found Oddrops at oddrops.blog.

I asked ChatGPT to create a test post describing the process. It prepared the text and submitted it to WordPress as a draft, using WordPress blocks so that the content can be edited in the usual editor.

The next step is to preview the draft and check its wording and appearance. I can request revisions in ChatGPT or make changes directly in WordPress. Once I am satisfied, I can instruct ChatGPT to publish it or schedule it for a later date.

The attraction is straightforward: drafting, discussion and revision can happen in one conversation, with no need to copy and paste the finished text into WordPress. The judgement about what to say—and whether it is ready to publish—remains mine.

This post was drafted by ChatGPT at my request as a practical test of the connection.

Bloody Andaluz

“From Paris to New York — now reborn in Andalusia.”

A Short History

First poured in Paris during the 1920s by bartender Fernand Petiot, the Bloody Mary began as a simple mix of vodka and tomato juice before being refined in New York with lemon, Worcestershire, and spice. Its exact namesake remains a mystery — Queen Mary I of England to some, a Chicago barmaid to others — yet the drink quickly claimed its place as a brunch classic and reputed restorative. From these beginnings grew a family of variations, among them the Andalusian gazpacho-based Bloody Andaluz. 

Description

A refined reimagining of the Bloody Mary. Vodka and Andalusian gazpacho blend into a chilled, aromatic cocktail with garden-fresh depth and a sun-kissed Mediterranean character.

Ingredients (per serving)

1.  50 ml vodka

2.  150–180 ml chilled gazpacho (homemade or fresh bottled)

3.  3–4 dashes (at least) Tabasco (to taste)

4.  Ice cubes

5.  Garnish: skewer of cherry tomato and manchego cube

Method

1.  In a tall glass, add vodka and Tabasco.

2.  Fill with ice cubes.

3.  Top up with chilled gazpacho.

4.  Stir gently to combine.

5.  Garnish with the tomato–manchego skewer laid across the rim.

Character: cool, spicy, and deeply savoury — a Bloody Mary with Andalusian soul.

—

A cocktail invented by me, described and polished by ChatGPT

‘Assassination Attempts and the Rise of the Right – Amid the Turmoil, Britain is Emerging as a Steadying Force’

As world leaders brace themselves for another potential Trump presidency, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quickly re-establishing the UK’s global influence…

It is astonishing to see how quickly Keir Starmer has settled into his role as Britain’s Prime Minister, confidently handling questions from the press as if he has been in the job for years. His straightforward style is not just a welcome relief for the UK, but perhaps just the steadying force Europe needs, as it faces turbulent winds from across the Atlantic

Source: ‘Assassination Attempts and the Rise of the Right – Amid the Turmoil, Britain is Emerging as a Steadying Force’

👍🏻🤞🏻

Lightroom for iPad: Generative AI

I recently upgraded to an iPad Pro 13” with the M4 chip for no better reason than John Gruber’s assertion that “a Lexus is nicer than a Toyota”. This prompted me to do a deep dive into apps for photo processing raw files from my iPhone 14 Pro Max and my camera, an OM Systems OM-1. I’ve collected a few apps over the years, but none of them really stuck apart from SnapSeed, which works well for editing JPEGs, but raw not so much.

I’m a big fan of Skylum’s Luminar Neo on my desktop machine, so when they released Luminar Mobile I sprung for a subscription without properly testing the app. Big mistake! The results are okay, but the interface sucks. The designer’s appear to have eschewed the conventional slider and used every control widget in the library for no good reason than to use every control widget in the library. Almost every adjustment would be more easily made using a slider from x to y. Skylum recently introduced a new version with a change of name, but no improvements to the UI. I have cancelled auto-renewal.

Many years ago I was a user of Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom on Windows, but the subscriptions became too expensive for my amateur use. I had a big fight with Adobe when I tried to cancel my subscription, which they eventually did, but it left a sour taste so I’ve avoided their products ever since. But time heals all wounds 😀, and I decided to take a look at Lightroom for iPad. It didn’t take may days of the free trial to convince me to take a subscription. The app gave great results on every image a threw at it: iPhone files JPEG, raw and ProRaw, ORF files from my camera and DNG files output from DxO Pure Raw 4 (highly recommended also), which I loaded into Apple Photos.

This post isn’t intended to be a review of Lightroom for iPad. What prompted me to write it was a newsletter plugging the “best retouch tool” on iOS. I haven’t had much occasion to use the Generative AI feature in Lightroom, so I tested it on this image:

Image of tarmac with cement repair surrounded by garbage bins
The original image of a tarmac repair

First I removed the bins:

The bins have been removed

Even the small section of the cement repair at the bottom right has been convincingly generated. Some dirt where the bottom left bin was standing has been added.

Next I removed the car:

The car is gone

The app has generated a dark area indicating some stain or damp under the car, though its shape is odd.

Tweaking the stain

For the final edit, I adjusted the darker area so it reached the edge of the frame. The final result is amazing!

Jasmin Paris: I ran ‘toughest race’ to inspire women worldwide

Jasmin Paris made history by becoming the first woman to finish the gruelling 100-mile Barkley Marathons.

Source: Jasmin Paris: I ran ‘toughest race’ to inspire women worldwide

Wow, just, wow!

John Greengo’s Camera Buyer’s Guide: 2024

Do you want the BEST camera or the RIGHT camera for you? Arm yourself with the knowledge you need before you make that all-important camera purchase. This guide is completely free, unbiased and unsponsored. A must-have for all photographers looking for a new camera.

Source: Camera Buyer’s Guide: 2024

I’ve just bought a new camera, so this is not relevant to me, but I’ve watched lots of videos that John has produced and they’re always informative. The guide is free and you might find it helpful.

The unfathomable bottomless stupidity of Suella Braverman

We’ve allowed morons to take control. And it’s turning us into morons too.

…

The Braverman story is about one thing and one thing only. It is that she is a moron. She is stupid in ways that can barely be described with words. She is an object lesson in the death of the human brain. She is an accumulation of dust on the floor of an unused factory. She is a moral imbecile.

Source: The unfathomable bottomless stupidity of Suella Braverman

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Copenhagen Declaration on Democracy: a humanist value – Humanists International

We call on all humanists around the world to stand in solidarity with those who are struggling to defend and promote democracy, and to work together to build a world in which democracy flourishes and the dignity and rights of all people are protected.

Source: Copenhagen Declaration on Democracy: a humanist value – Humanists International

Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit

Despite the claims of speed reading apps, it turns out that you actually have to read the book if you want to learn from it.

Source: Neuroscience shows that speed reading is bullshit